Model Scorecard: 3-5 on Opening Night as the NHL Board Went 1-4

The model went 3-5 on its most recent graded boards, the Tuesday, Sept. 29 slate that opened the MLB Wild Card round and the 2026-27 NHL season. Baseball was fine at 2-1. Hockey was not: the opening-night NHL board went 1-4, and the losses included the model's highest-confidence call of the night. That is a losing day, and this column reports it as one.

A note on scope before the numbers. Wednesday's slate (four Wild Card Game 2s and two NHL games) is not graded here. The model's sides for those games could not be confirmed from the public record at writing time, and this column grades only picks it can verify. Tuesday's boards were published in full, so every pick below is the one the model posted before first pitch or puck drop.

The scorecard

Overall: 3-5 (37.5%). Eight graded picks across two leagues.

MLB: 2-1. The board listed three of the four Wild Card openers, with the Yankees (56%), Padres (53%) and Astros (53%). New York and San Diego won; Houston lost. Every MLB pick matched the market's number to the point, so this was a day where the model added no edge of its own; it simply sided with the favorites, and two of three held. Entering the day the model was 805-619 (56.5%) on graded MLB picks this season with a Brier score of 0.242, and a 2-1 day barely moves either figure.

NHL: 1-4. Five games, five picks: Edmonton (59%), Vegas (59%), Toronto (53%), Carolina (52%) and the Rangers (52%). Only Vegas won.

High-confidence tier. There was no 65%+ pick on either board; the top of the slate was the two 59% NHL calls, and they split 1-1. The model's firmest MLB call, the Yankees at 56%, landed. Put together, the three strongest picks of the night went 2-1, and the five picks at 53% or lower went 1-4. That is roughly how a calibrated model is supposed to behave across a small sample: the coin flips flip, and the stronger leans hit more often.

Calibration note. Both 59% NHL picks were well below the market (71% on Edmonton, 69% on Vegas), and the model's own board flagged them as leans rather than plays. The one pick where the model sat above the market by 3 points or more, the Rangers at 52% against a 49% market price, lost.

Best call / worst miss

Best call: Yankees over Red Sox, 9-0. The model's top MLB pick was never in doubt late. Cam Schlittler threw 6.1 scoreless innings with 10 strikeouts and allowed one hit, and Ben Rice drove in six runs, capped by an eighth-inning grand slam. A 56% pick earns no extra credit for a nine-run margin, but it was the right side. The Padres pick also landed comfortably, 8-0 over the Cubs behind seven scoreless innings from Michael King, though at 53% that was barely a lean.

Worst miss: Oilers over Canucks, a 6-5 overtime loss. Edmonton was the model's highest-confidence pick of the night, and it lost at home on opening night. Vancouver built a three-goal lead, gave all of it back in the third period, and won when Paul Cotter scored 1:59 into overtime. Evan Bouchard's three goals and two assists did not change the result. The market was even more confident in Edmonton than the model was, which explains the miss without excusing it: a 59% pick loses about four times in ten, and this was one of those nights.

The other misses, plainly. The Rangers pick, the model's only real disagreement with the market, lost 3-0 in Boston after the Bruins scored three times in the final four minutes, the last into an empty net. Carolina lost 1-0 to Florida in overtime on Gustav Forsling's goal with 4.3 seconds left. Toronto lost 3-2 to Montreal. In baseball, the White Sox beat Houston 6-3 to flip the Astros pick. Close losses count the same as blowouts.

What it means

Mostly noise, with one thing to watch. Eight picks is far too few to read anything into a 37.5% day, and the MLB side is anchored to a season-long record of 56.5% over more than 1,400 graded picks. One Tuesday does not move that.

The NHL board is the honest caveat. Opening night is the hardest board of the season for any team-strength model: every record reads 0-0, rosters and coaches have changed (Edmonton and Vancouver both had new head coaches behind the bench), and the model is leaning on last season's form. A 1-4 start says nothing yet about whether the hockey model is calibrated for 2026-27, but it does mean there is no early cushion. The fair way to judge it is the running hit-rate and Brier score over the first few weeks, not the first five games.

The tougher question is the value side. The model's lone above-market NHL pick lost, and its two below-market favorites split. Over a season, that disagreement with the market is where the model has to prove itself. One night does not settle it either way, and this column will keep grading it in public.

Responsible play

This is a record of past model output, not betting advice. Verdexed grades its model in public for transparency and entertainment. Past results do not predict future outcomes, nothing here is a recommendation to place a wager, and no pick is ever a guarantee, even a strong model loses regularly.

You must be of legal betting age in your jurisdiction and located where sports wagering is legal to bet. Sports betting is not available everywhere; know and follow the laws where you are. Never bet more than you can afford to lose, and never chase losses.

If gambling is affecting you or someone you know, help is available. In the US, call or text 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537), or visit ncpgambling.org. Please play responsibly.