Everything is FREE until August 1free through July 31 →
Back to Blog
RankingsNHL2026-08-17

Fantasy Hockey Winger Tiers for 2026-27: Kucherov Alone, Then a Crowded Second Tier

By Verdexed NHL Desk

Winger is the deepest position in fantasy hockey and the one where drafters most consistently overpay at the top. With training camps roughly a month away and draft season starting, the 2026-27 winger board has one clear name at the top and then a cluster of players separated by less than their draft costs imply.

Nikita Kucherov is that name. Coming off a season in which he was awarded the Hart Trophy as the league's most valuable player, with production that improved across the board to 44 goals, 86 assists, and 130 points, he sits at the top of essentially every published winger ranking. The interesting question is not whether he is first. It is how much you should pay for the privilege.

Tier 1: Kucherov, and the case against paying for him

Kucherov's 130-point season is the kind of output that justifies a first-round pick in any format, and he has the multi-category profile that fantasy managers pay for: elite assist volume, real goal-scoring, and the power play deployment that guarantees both.

The counter-argument is positional. In a league where you start four or five wingers, spending a top-three overall pick on one means passing on the far scarcer elite center and elite defenseman. The replacement level at winger is higher than at any other skater position, which means the gap between the first winger off the board and the twelfth is smaller in real fantasy terms than the gap between the first center and the twelfth.

The practical rule: take Kucherov if he falls to you at the back of the first round. Do not reach for him at the top of it when the position behind him is this deep.

Tier 2: the cluster that decides drafts

David Pastrnak in Boston and Kirill Kaprizov in Minnesota are the two names most consistently ranked immediately behind Kucherov, and both come with the same profile: a high-volume shooter who anchors his team's power play and whose production is largely insulated from linemate changes.

Mitch Marner in Vegas and Mikko Rantanen in Dallas round out the top group. Both changed situations in recent seasons, and both landed in offenses that support their production. Rantanen in particular offers the goal-scoring volume that the assist-heavy names in this tier do not, which matters enormously in category leagues and matters very little in points-only formats.

Artemi Panarin is the most interesting name in this range, and the rankings disagree about him more than about anyone else on the board. He has appeared as high as the top ten on positional lists and considerably lower on overall rankings, which is exactly the pattern you see with a productive player whose age curve is a live question. That disagreement is opportunity: in a league where other managers are anchored on his name, he goes early; in a league where they are anchored on age, he falls.

Tier 3: the volume shooters

This is where drafts are actually won, and the organizing principle is simple. In category leagues, goals and shots are scarcer and less replaceable than assists, and the players who deliver them are systematically underdrafted relative to playmakers with similar point totals.

Pavel Dorofeyev is the cleanest example on this board. He is one of only 12 players to have scored at least 35 goals in each of the past two seasons, which is an extremely short list, and he is ranked well outside the top 50 in published overall rankings. A repeatable 35-goal profile at that price is one of the better values available.

Mason Marchment belongs in this range as well after a stretch of near point-per-game production following a midseason trade, and he now enters a situation in San Jose with a path to top-six minutes alongside the team's franchise center. Tyler Bertuzzi in Chicago is the archetype of the late-round goal source: not a player who will help you in assists, but a reliable source of the category most drafters neglect until it is too late.

The Verdexed model take

Our projections build winger value from three inputs in descending order of weight: power play unit, individual shot volume, and quality of the center he plays with. Prior-season point totals are an input but a heavily regressed one, because point totals for wingers are the noisiest skater statistic in hockey.

That framework produces two systematic disagreements with consensus rankings. First, it is less enthusiastic about assist-driven wingers coming off career years, because assists regress harder than goals and because secondary assists are close to random. Second, it is more enthusiastic about second-power-play-unit players on high-scoring teams than about first-unit players on bad ones, which consensus rankings tend to get backwards.

The single largest gap our model identifies on the 2026-27 board is at the back of the top 50, where several repeatable goal scorers are being priced as if their production were luck-driven when the underlying shot volume says otherwise.

Draft strategy: what to actually do

Wait on wingers. That is the entire strategic conclusion, and it holds in nearly every format. The position is deep enough that a manager who takes centers, defensemen, and a goalie with the first four picks and then loads up on wingers from round five onward will finish with a better roster than one who takes two elite wingers early.

The one exception is a category league that counts hits, blocks, or penalty minutes, where the specific wingers who provide those categories alongside offense are genuinely scarce and worth reaching for.

Two rules for the middle rounds. Prioritize confirmed power play unit assignment over name recognition, because a second-line winger on the first unit outproduces a first-line winger on the second unit almost every time. And when two players project similarly, take the goal scorer, because goals hold their value across formats while assists do not.

Camps open next month, and the line combinations that emerge in preseason will settle several of these questions. Draft the board you have, but leave room to move on the players whose power play deployment gets confirmed in September.

Want more analysis?

Check out our predictions and DFS tools powered by the same quantitative engine.