Everything is FREE until August 1free through July 31 →
Back to Blog
NewsNFL2026-09-07

The Falcons Are the Last Team in the NFL Without a Named Week 1 Quarterback

By Verdexed NFL Desk

Atlanta has not named a starting quarterback for its opener at Pittsburgh on Sept. 13, making the Falcons the last team in the league with the job formally unsettled less than a week before kickoff. Kevin Stefanski has split first-team reps between Michael Penix Jr. and Tua Tagovailoa and has declined to attach a timeline to the decision.

Every other starting job in the NFL has been announced. This one is being decided by committee, and the committee is unusually large.

Who is actually making the call

General manager Ian Cunningham said the decision will be a group effort involving himself, Stefanski, president of football operations Matt Ryan, and owner Arthur Blank. That is a notable sentence for a first-year head coach's first significant personnel decision, and it explains why the announcement has taken as long as it has. Quarterback calls made by four people take longer than quarterback calls made by one.

The medical piece is straightforward. Penix tore the ACL in his left knee last November and was not cleared for full practice participation until late August, which cost him the entire preseason and most of the on-field evaluation a coaching staff would normally use. Tagovailoa was healthy throughout camp and played in the preseason games, but a rough exhibition run that included multiple fumbles and little downfield production kept him from locking the job down.

Reporting on the outcome has pointed in both directions. Some accounts have Penix expected to open the season as the starter. Others describe Tagovailoa as likely to start on a short leash. Neither is confirmed, and the team has said nothing.

Why this matters more than a normal QB battle

The usual fantasy read on an unsettled quarterback job is that it damages the quarterbacks and leaves the skill players roughly intact. Atlanta is the exception, because the two candidates play meaningfully different styles.

Penix is the vertical passer. His entire college and early professional profile was built on layered throws outside the numbers and shot plays off play-action. Tagovailoa's production has historically come from timing, rhythm, and yards after the catch, with a lower average depth of target and a heavier concentration of throws in the middle third of the field.

Those two profiles do not distribute targets the same way. A Penix start pushes air yards toward Drake London on the boundary. A Tagovailoa start pushes efficiency toward the underneath and intermediate options, which historically has meant more work for the tight end and the back out of the backfield.

Fantasy fallout

Drake London is the player whose weekly range is widest. He is a boundary receiver drafted as a high-end WR2 or low-end WR1, and the difference between a quarterback who targets him 20 yards downfield and one who targets him at 10 is roughly the difference between those two tiers. London managers cannot do anything about it before Sunday, but they should set expectations accordingly and avoid benching him on the strength of a rumor.

Kyle Pitts is the beneficiary of a Tagovailoa start. Stefanski's offensive history has centered tight ends in the middle of the field, and a quarterback who lives in that same space compounds the effect. If Atlanta names Tagovailoa, Pitts becomes a genuine streaming option in a week where the tight end position is thin.

Bijan Robinson is the least affected. He is a volume back on a team that will be an underdog on the road, and underdog game scripts historically increase his receiving work rather than decrease his usage. Neither quarterback changes that.

Neither passer is startable in one-quarterback leagues in Week 1. A quarterback whose job was announced days before kickoff, on the road, against a defense with a real pass rush, is not a lineup solution.

The Verdexed model take

Our projections treat this as a coin flip weighted slightly toward the healthier player, which is how the model handles any competition where one candidate has missed the evaluation window. That is a genuinely uncomfortable place to be for a projection system, because the two outcomes produce different target distributions rather than different totals.

The useful output is not the quarterback projection at all. It is the spread of London's outcomes, which is wider this week than for any other receiver in his tier. The model's advice in that situation is to accept variance rather than trade it away, because London's ceiling under either quarterback is higher than the ceiling of the receiver a manager would swap him for.

Betting angle

Pittsburgh has been laid at around three points, and the market has held that number through a week of silence from Atlanta. That stability is itself informative: books do not believe the identity of the Falcons quarterback moves the game by a full point, which is a reasonable position given that both candidates carry real questions.

The more interesting market is Atlanta's team total and London's receiving yardage prop, both of which should react when the announcement lands. A Penix start is the higher-variance outcome in both directions, and a prop posted before the news is priced against a blend rather than an outcome. Anyone holding a view on which quarterback starts has an edge available in the receiving markets that does not exist on the side.

What's next

Teams file their first official injury and participation reports of the week early this week, and a starting quarterback announcement typically arrives alongside or shortly after. Atlanta has no incentive to tip its hand early against a defense that would benefit from the preparation time, which is the most likely explanation for the silence.

For fantasy managers, the deadline is Sunday morning, not Monday. Lock London in, treat Pitts as a conditional start that improves if Tagovailoa is named, and leave both quarterbacks on waivers. The team that waited longest to name a starter is not the team to trust in Week 1.

Want more analysis?

Check out our predictions and DFS tools powered by the same quantitative engine.