Yesterday's picks: how the model did (August 26)

There is no graded line for August 26. Verdexed stated no side on any of Wednesday's fifteen MLB games, claimed no edge, and assigned no confidence tier, so the honest entry is zero picks, zero correct, zero incorrect. That is twenty-two consecutive slates with nothing to grade.

Baseball was again the entire graded universe. The NBA and NHL remain in their offseasons, and the NFL sat between preseason weeks, with Week 3 not opening until Thursday, August 27.

The scorecard

Zero stated directions, zero correct, zero incorrect for August 26.

The stated-side ledger does not move: 12-7 across 19 decisions, unchanged since August 4.

No trailing accuracy figure and no Brier value are claimed here, because neither was retrievable. Verdexed's public accuracy surface was again unreachable from this publishing environment, and no per-tier figure for August 26 surfaced through search. With no high-confidence tier to grade, whether the 65 percent and 70 percent bands held on Wednesday cannot be answered from this page.

What can be scored is the market board Wednesday's column surveyed, the comparison point a model number would have been measured against. Three moneyline prices were quoted, and two of them won. Cleveland, listed near -144 and the widest price on the board, beat Los Angeles **4-3** at Angel Stadium. Philadelphia, near -130 in Seattle, won **6-0**. Los Angeles, also near -130 at Atlanta, lost **6-5**. That is 2-1 on quoted prices, with the firmest of the three holding, and none of the three belonged to Verdexed.

Best call / worst miss

There is no best call and no worst miss, because no side was stated. Naming one now would be inventing a record after the results were in, and a scorecard that back-fills its picks is worth less than none at all.

The cleanest result on the quoted board came at T-Mobile Park, where Philadelphia salvaged the series with a **6-0** win. Bryce Harper and Kyle Schwarber accounted for five runs off Bryan Woo on two swings in the first inning, Harper on a two-run drive to left-center that cleared a leaping Julio Rodriguez and Schwarber on a three-run shot to right, his major league leading 40th home run. Jesus Luzardo, who entered 11-5, allowed a single hit, a two-out liner to left by Jhonny Pereda in the fifth, with three walks and nine strikeouts. A short price backed by that kind of start is what a favorite is supposed to look like, and also the least informative kind of result.

The result that would have punished the most confident number, had one been published, came at Truist Park. Los Angeles carried a lead into the ninth and lost **6-5** when Ha-Seong Kim singled home Lane Thomas with two outs off Tanner Scott, whose record fell to 1-5. Victor Mederos had struck out two in a scoreless top of the inning to keep it tied. The Dodgers had already lost their starter: Roki Sasaki allowed four runs on six hits in 3 1/3 innings with three strikeouts and two walks before leaving in the fourth with a blister on his middle finger, and he was subsequently placed on the injured list. A starter departing in the fourth is the most common way a morning price goes stale, and no probability computed before first pitch can see it coming.

Cleveland's win was the messier of the two chalk holds. The Angels scored first for the second straight game and gave the lead back again, allowing three consecutive hits after the first out of an inning, including a ground-rule double by Steven Kwan that tied the game at 3-3. Los Angeles drew eight walks and collected three hits, left six runners on base, and lost the series.

Two unpriced games turned as well. Toronto's bullpen, working after Shane Bieber's move to the injured list, shut out Kansas City **3-0** at Rogers Centre and ended the Royals' nine-game winning streak. At Yankee Stadium, New York beat Houston **9-3** on Cody Bellinger's bases-loaded double in the seventh.

What it means

Twenty-two days of zeros is not a bad stretch of picks. It is an absence of picks, and the two should never be confused. Nothing on this page argues the model is calibrated well or badly, because nothing measurable has been produced since August 4. The 12-7 mark on the ledger describes early August and nothing since, and it describes the present less accurately with every day it stands still.

This remains an availability problem rather than a calibration problem, and it is the kind a reader should hold against the platform rather than the math. A public accuracy surface that cannot be read is not a record. Until per-game probabilities and the trailing accuracy and Brier figures are retrievable again, this column will keep printing zeros and confirming finals.

The market going 2-1 on its quoted prices is not a substitute finding, and it is worth saying plainly that Wednesday looks no better for the platform than Tuesday did, when the same board went 1-2. Favorites winning two of three on a fifteen-game Wednesday is an ordinary night, well inside normal variance, and it says nothing about any model, least of all one that stated no opinion.

Responsible play

**This is a record of past model output, not betting advice.** Verdexed grades its model in public for transparency and entertainment. Past results do not predict future outcomes, nothing here is a recommendation to place a wager, and no pick is ever a guarantee, even a strong model loses regularly.

**You must be 21+** (or the legal age in your jurisdiction) and located where sports wagering is legal to bet. Sports betting is not available everywhere; know and follow the laws where you are. Never bet more than you can afford to lose, and never chase losses.

If gambling is affecting you or someone you know, help is available. In the US, call or text **1-800-GAMBLER** (1-800-426-2537), or visit ncpgambling.org. Please play responsibly.