Yesterday's picks: how the model did (August 25)

There is no graded line for August 25. Verdexed stated no side on any of Tuesday's eleven MLB games, claimed no edge, and assigned no confidence tier, so the honest entry is zero picks, zero correct, zero incorrect. That makes twenty-one consecutive slates with nothing to grade.

Baseball was again the entire graded universe. The NBA and NHL are in their offseasons, and the NFL sat between preseason weeks, with Week 3 not opening until Thursday, August 27, so no football was played Tuesday and none is scored here.

The scorecard

Zero stated directions, zero correct, zero incorrect for August 25.

The stated-side ledger does not move: 12-7 across 19 decisions, unchanged since August 4.

No trailing accuracy figure and no Brier value are claimed here, because none was retrievable. Verdexed's public accuracy surface was unreachable from this publishing environment, and no per-tier figure for August 25 surfaced through search. With no high-confidence tier to grade, whether the 65 percent and 70 percent bands held on Tuesday cannot be answered from this page.

What can be scored is the market board Tuesday's column surveyed, the comparison point a model number would have been measured against. Three moneyline prices were quoted, and two of them lost. Los Angeles, listed near -157 and the widest price on the board, lost at Atlanta **4-3**. Toronto, near -120 at home, lost to Kansas City **5-3**. Arizona, listed near -111 in the closest game found, beat Chicago **5-4**. That is 1-2 on quoted prices, with the two firmer of the three both falling, and none of the three belonged to Verdexed.

Best call / worst miss

There is no best call and no worst miss, because no side was stated. Assigning one now would be inventing a record after the results were in, and a scorecard that back-fills its picks is worth less than none at all.

The result that would have punished the most confident number came at Truist Park. Los Angeles was the firmest price quoted and lost **4-3**. Tyler Glasnow, activated Tuesday after back spasms had sidelined him since May, needed 35 pitches to escape a three-run first inning, then retired 14 of the final 16 batters he faced, finishing five innings with three earned runs and seven strikeouts. Atlanta won it in the eighth, when Matt Olson doubled to lead off and Ozzie Albies singled him home off Tanner Scott. Shohei Ohtani later tripled to open an inning against Raisel Iglesias, putting the tying run 90 feet away with nobody out, and the Dodgers could not bring him home.

The cleanest chalk result belonged to Arizona, and it needed a walk-off to get there. Brandon Pfaadt allowed a three-run home run to Ian Happ in the fourth and Chicago added a fourth run in the sixth. Ryan Waldschmidt, entering with two outs in the ninth and the tying run on second, hit a 408-foot home run off Jacob Webb for the **5-4** final. A pick-em price cashing on a two-out ninth-inning home run is a reminder that a coin-flip game is a coin flip in outcome as well as price.

The other quoted loser was Toronto. Seth Lugo allowed one run in five innings and Salvador Perez drove in two as Kansas City won **5-3** for its ninth straight victory. Max Scherzer, whose 1-6 record and 7.40 ERA the morning column had flagged as the reason a short home price looked odd, worked five innings and gave up two runs with four strikeouts and five walks, falling to 1-7.

Two unpriced games ran against form as well. Milwaukee, 81-50 entering the night, lost **3-2** in ten innings at Citi Field to a New York club more than twenty games worse, Francisco Lindor's bases-loaded diving catch in the ninth holding the tie before the winning run scored in the tenth on a throwing error. Detroit ended a six-game losing streak by beating Tampa Bay **4-1** behind Max Clark's two-run homer and 4 2/3 scoreless innings of relief. Houston beat New York **9-7** at Yankee Stadium, where Yainer Diaz hit two solo home runs and Yordan Alvarez tripled home the go-ahead run in the eighth.

What it means

Twenty-one days of zeros is not a bad stretch of picks. It is an absence of picks, and the two should never be confused. Nothing on this page argues the model is calibrated well or badly, because nothing measurable has been produced since August 4. The 12-7 mark on the ledger describes early August and nothing since, and it describes the present less accurately with every day it stands still.

This remains an availability problem rather than a calibration problem, and it is the kind a reader should hold against the platform rather than the math. A public accuracy surface that cannot be read is not a record. Until per-game probabilities and the trailing accuracy and Brier figures are retrievable again, this column will keep printing zeros and confirming finals.

The market going 1-2 on its quoted prices is not a substitute finding. Favorites losing two of three on an eleven-game Tuesday is an ordinary night, well inside normal variance, and it says nothing about any model, least of all one that stated no opinion.

Responsible play

**This is a record of past model output, not betting advice.** Verdexed grades its model in public for transparency and entertainment. Past results do not predict future outcomes, nothing here is a recommendation to place a wager, and no pick is ever a guarantee, even a strong model loses regularly.

**You must be 21+** (or the legal age in your jurisdiction) and located where sports wagering is legal to bet. Sports betting is not available everywhere; know and follow the laws where you are. Never bet more than you can afford to lose, and never chase losses.

If gambling is affecting you or someone you know, help is available. In the US, call or text **1-800-GAMBLER** (1-800-426-2537), or visit ncpgambling.org. Please play responsibly.