Everything is FREE until August 1free through July 31 →
Back to Blog
AnalysisMLB2026-08-21

Yesterday's picks: how the model did (August 20)

By Verdexed Analytics

There is no graded line for August 20. Verdexed's column for Thursday's MLB board stated no sides, claimed no edge, and assigned no confidence tier, because the model's per-game probabilities were not retrievable when it published. The honest entry is zero picks, zero correct, zero incorrect, and that makes sixteen consecutive slates with nothing for this desk to grade. Baseball was again the whole graded universe. The NBA and NHL remain in their offseasons, and Thursday's NFL preseason Week 2 games were not on any published Verdexed board, so none are scored here. What can be scored is what Thursday's column actually printed, which was the market's ranking rather than the model's. Six games carried a confirmed two-way price with a favorite. Those favorites went 4-2, and both losses were the two firmest prices on the page.

The scorecard

Zero stated directions, zero correct, zero incorrect for August 20.

The stated-side ledger does not move: 12-7 across 19 decisions, unchanged since August 4.

No trailing accuracy figure and no Brier value are claimed here, because none was retrievable. Verdexed's public accuracy surface could not be reached at publication, and no per-tier number for August 20 was available anywhere else. That is sixteen slates without a quotable calibration figure. There is no high-confidence tier to grade either, so whether the 65 percent and 70 percent bands held on Thursday cannot be answered from the page.

The quoted prices are a separate instrument and earn the model no credit in either direction. They are the only numbers Thursday's column printed, so they are the only ones that can be scored. Six of the nine games on the slate were surveyed with a confirmable price and a favorite.

Houston, quoted near -188 and the largest price on the board, lost **18-3** to the Angels at Daikin Park. Tampa Bay, near -172 and the second-shortest price surveyed, lost **5-1** to Toronto at Tropicana Field. Texas, near -133, beat Washington **2-0** at Globe Life Field. Milwaukee, near -126, beat Seattle **7-4** at American Family Field. New York, near -118, beat Baltimore **6-1** at Camden Yards. St. Louis, a road favorite near -114, beat Cincinnati **10-9** at Great American Ball Park.

That is 4-2 for the quoted favorites, with a shape worth noting: the two shortest prices both lost, and the four closest to a coin flip all held. Three games on the nine-game slate carried no confirmable price in Thursday's column and are not scored.

Best call / worst miss

There is no best call and no worst miss, because no side was stated. Naming one now would be inventing a record after the fact.

The nearest thing to a good call belongs to the market. Texas at -133 won **2-0**, with four pitchers combining on a one-hitter. Jacob deGrom struck out 10 over six innings and reached 2,000 career strikeouts in the second-fewest games in major league history. Corey Seager's opposite-field homer and a Nicky Lopez sacrifice fly were the only runs scored. The column did not have that starter right: it listed Kumar Rocker for Texas, and deGrom pitched. Being on the correct side for the wrong reason is not a model result and is not credited as one.

The nearest thing to a miss is the top of the board. Houston at -188 was the firmest number Thursday's column surveyed, and the Angels, the worst team in the division, won **18-3** at Daikin Park. Peter Lambert, whom the column called Houston's most dependable starter this season, allowed nine runs. Reliever Bryan King allowed five more while recording four outs. It was the most runs the Angels have scored against Houston since 2019, and it dropped the Astros back to .500 with a one-game lead over Texas in the AL West. A price near -188 implies roughly 65 percent before the house margin comes off, so it loses better than one time in three, and a fifteen-run loss counts the same as a one-run loss in a win-accuracy column. The margin still says something the price did not: the input was wrong, not just unlucky.

What it means

One day of market chalk going 4-2 is noise, and a six-game sample separates nothing. The pattern that matters is the one this desk keeps reporting about itself. Sixteen straight slates without a stated model side means there is no recent record to anchor to and no honest trailing accuracy or Brier value to cite. The 12-7 ledger closed on August 4 and is now more than two weeks stale. Nineteen decisions would be a small sample even if it were current, and readers should treat it that way.

The starter problem deserves its own line, because Thursday's column flagged it and then lived it. Two of the six games it surveyed rested on probables that conflicted across sources, and at least one of those listings was simply wrong. The starting pitcher is the most important input a baseball model has, and when the probable is unconfirmed a stated probability is worth less than it looks. Sixteen days without a graded line is a failure of the pipeline, not a stylistic choice, and it will keep being reported here until it ends.

Responsible play

**This is a record of past model output, not betting advice.** Verdexed grades its model in public for transparency and entertainment. Past results do not predict future outcomes, nothing here is a recommendation to place a wager, and no pick is ever a guarantee, even a strong model loses regularly.

**You must be 21+** (or the legal age in your jurisdiction) and located where sports wagering is legal to bet. Sports betting is not available everywhere; know and follow the laws where you are. Never bet more than you can afford to lose, and never chase losses.

If gambling is affecting you or someone you know, help is available. In the US, call or text **1-800-GAMBLER** (1-800-426-2537), or visit ncpgambling.org. Please play responsibly.

Want more analysis?

Check out our predictions and DFS tools powered by the same quantitative engine.