Everything is FREE until September 30free through September 30 →
Back to Blog
PredictionMLB2026-09-17

MLB Today's Best Bets (September 17): No Model Board for a Nine-Game Thursday

By Verdexed Analytics

Yoshinobu Yamamoto in 2024
Photo: All-Pro Reels from District of Columbia, USA / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Nine games are on the reported board Thursday, from a 12:35 p.m. ET first pitch in Pittsburgh to a 9:38 p.m. ET start in Anaheim, and the most interesting price on the slate belongs to a team well under .500. The Mets, reported at 69-82, are listed as home favorites at minus 142 against the Phillies, reported at 83-68 and still chasing both the National League East and the top wild card. This column exists to set Verdexed's own model probability beside prices like that one and report the gap between them. Thursday it cannot. The verdexed.com prediction, edge, and accuracy pages are blocked from this publishing environment, and per-game win probabilities, confidence tiers, and edge figures were not retrievable through search either. There is no biggest edge to name today, and no probability printed below is the model's. What follows is a matchup and market read, published as model output and entertainment rather than betting advice, for readers 21 and older located where sports wagering is legal.

How to read this

A normal edition carries two numbers per game. The first is Verdexed's model probability, built from a weighted feature set per matchup (recent form, team strength and scoring differential, home-field advantage, rest, and in baseball the starting pitcher and the bullpen behind him) and resolved through ten thousand simulations. The second is the market's own probability, taken from the current moneyline with the sportsbook's margin removed. The edge is the gap between the two, and it is meaningful only when the model half is formed independently of the market half; comparing a market-blended number back to the market would be circular. Only the market half was readable Thursday. Verdexed logs every prediction before first pitch and scores it afterward on win accuracy and on Brier score, where lower is better, but the trailing thirty-day figures were not retrievable at publication, so no hit rate is cited here and none should be inferred. The standing caveat holds regardless: a calibrated 60 percent side is meant to lose two games in five, and no edge is a guarantee.

The model's top edges today

There are none to publish. An edge requires a model probability and a market probability observed at the same moment, and Thursday only the second was readable. A thin slate and a slate whose edges could not be retrieved are different findings, and this is the third straight publishing day for the second one. Nothing below is a pick, a rated play, or a confidence tier.

Thursday's board, market side only

All probabilities in this section are the market's own, computed from the listed moneylines with the sportsbook's margin removed. They are the comparison point a model opinion would be measured against, not projections in their own right. Every starting pitcher named here is a projected starter rather than a confirmed one, and a late scratch can change a game's read entirely.

**Phillies at Mets, 7:15 p.m. ET.** New York is minus 142 and Philadelphia plus 120, which puts the market near 56 percent on the home team despite a reported fourteen-game gap in the standings. The projected matchup explains most of it: Nolan McLean, reported at 11-9 with a 3.24 ERA, against Aaron Nola, reported at 6-10 with a 4.69 ERA. This is the clearest case on the slate of a price driven by the mound rather than season-long team quality, and exactly the spot where an independent model number would be worth having.

**Dodgers at Reds, 12:40 p.m. ET.** Los Angeles is minus 168 and Cincinnati plus 142, roughly 60 percent on the visitors, in the projected matchup of Yoshinobu Yamamoto against Rhett Lowder. The Dodgers have reportedly clinched a postseason spot, which introduces a lineup and workload question no pregame price fully captures.

**Padres at Rockies, 3:10 p.m. ET.** San Diego is minus 166 and Colorado plus 140, close to 60 percent on the Padres. The Coors Field run environment is the whole story for the total here.

**Brewers at Pirates, 12:35 p.m. ET.** Milwaukee is minus 144 and Pittsburgh plus 122, about 57 percent on the Brewers, with Dustin May the projected Milwaukee starter. Milwaukee reportedly clinched the National League Central on Tuesday, a fourth consecutive division title, so rest and rotation management are live considerations.

**Royals at Astros, 7:15 p.m. ET.** Houston is minus 146 and Kansas City plus 119, roughly 56 percent on the Astros, who are reported to hold the American League West.

The rest of the board fills in around those five, and two of the others carry real stakes: the Tigers at the White Sox at 7:40 p.m. ET, with the American League Central lead reportedly still unsettled between Chicago and Cleveland, and the Red Sox at the Rangers at 8:05 p.m. ET, with Texas among the teams reportedly chasing the final American League wild card. The Athletics at the Rays and the Twins at the Angels complete the nine.

What could go wrong

The largest single risk on a September baseball slate is the projected starter who never takes the mound. Every pitcher above is projected, not confirmed, and a scratch announced hours before first pitch can move a price several points and invalidate the matchup logic behind it. The second risk is motivation and usage. With the Brewers, Dodgers, Rays, and Yankees all reportedly clinched, contending clubs are resting regulars and stretching bullpens differently than they did in July, and September rosters carry call-ups whose major league sample is too small for any model to weigh confidently. Weather is the third, particularly for totals: the Coors Field game is the obvious one, but wind at any park can move a total more than a lineup change. The standing risk today is the one named at the top: with no model board retrievable, there is no independent number against which to judge these prices.

Responsible play

**This is model output, not betting advice.** Verdexed publishes its model's probabilities and edges for informational and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here is a recommendation to place a wager, and no outcome is guaranteed, even the model's highest-confidence picks lose regularly.

**You must be of legal betting age in your jurisdiction** and located where sports wagering is legal to bet. Sports betting is not available everywhere; know and follow the laws where you are. Never bet more than you can afford to lose, and never chase losses.

If gambling is affecting you or someone you know, help is available. In the US, call or text **1-800-GAMBLER** (1-800-426-2537), or visit ncpgambling.org. Please play responsibly.

Want more analysis?

Check out our predictions and DFS tools powered by the same quantitative engine.