Odds updated live
Back to Blog
AnalysisMLB2026-06-13

Yesterday's picks: how the model did as the favorites split and the Dodgers got routed in Chicago

By Verdexed Analytics

Jacob Misiorowski
Photo: Drovetochicago / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA-4.0)

Verdexed graded one sport on June 12, a full Friday MLB card, with the NBA Finals and Stanley Cup Final both dark on the calendar between games. The honest one line read is that the model's favorites split. Several of the mid-tier sides it leaned on held, but the single heaviest favorite on the board, the Los Angeles Dodgers, got routed in Chicago, and that one result is what keeps a passable Friday from grading as a clean winning one. A desk that grades in public has to put the costly miss in the lead when it is the story, and on June 12 it was.

This was not a disaster and it was not a sweep. It was the kind of even card a baseball model produces most nights, with enough chalk holding to keep the day respectable and one loud miss to keep it from looking sharp.

The scorecard

Working a full Friday slate, the model's favorites came in mixed. On the right side of the ledger, the Chicago Cubs handled the San Francisco Giants 5-1 behind a Michael Busch three run homer, the New York Yankees took care of the Toronto Blue Jays, the Houston Astros beat the Kansas City Royals, and the Tampa Bay Rays edged the Los Angeles Angels. Those are the spots where the model's leans landed, a cluster of small to mid-priced favorites doing what favorites are supposed to do.

The problem sat at the top of the confidence ladder. The Dodgers, the heaviest chalk on the board as a division leader visiting a White Sox club near the bottom of the standings, lost 8-2. Chicago's Chase Meidroth had three hits and two RBIs against a depleted Los Angeles lineup still without its full complement of bats, and the worst team in the matchup beat the best one by six. When a model's single most confident pick is the one that busts, the day grades worse than the raw count of wins and losses suggests, because the high confidence tier is exactly where a probability model is supposed to earn its keep.

Verdexed does not surface a single day accuracy figure or Brier number publicly, so the calibration read here stays qualitative, but a Friday where the mid-tier favorites mostly held while the heaviest chalk got routed grades as roughly a coin flip, not a winning card. The favorites that cashed were the cheaper ones, the favorite that lost was the priciest one, and that mix is the opposite of what a calibrated model wants on a given night.

Best call / worst miss

The sharpest correct call was the Milwaukee Brewers at home. With Jacob Misiorowski on the mound, the Brewers were the side the model wanted, and Misiorowski delivered the kind of start that makes a favorite look easy, a complete game one-hitter with 15 strikeouts and no walks in a 6-0 win over the Philadelphia Phillies. Jake Bauers added a three run homer in the fifth. When the favorite's starter faces the minimum into the late innings, the model's lean is never in doubt, and this was as clean as a winning pick gets.

The worst miss is the Dodgers, and it is not close. Los Angeles was the day's marquee favorite, the kind of heavy chalk a model leans into hardest, and it lost 8-2 to a White Sox team that entered as one of the weakest in baseball. A depleted Dodgers lineup managed two runs while Chicago piled on eight, and a side the model rated comfortably the better team got beaten comfortably. Naming it plainly is the job. The model's most confident read of the day was wrong, and it was wrong by a lot.

What it means

One split Friday is noise, and the right frame stays the season long body of work rather than a single box score. The model did not break because its heaviest favorite lost any more than it became sharp the day before when its favorites bounced back. Heavy chalk losing outright to a bad team is one of the most common variance events in baseball, a sport where the worse team wins something like four times in ten on any given night, and a model that never lost a high confidence pick would be a model that was not actually pricing risk.

What June 12 is worth is a reminder that confidence is not certainty. The Dodgers were the right side on paper and still the wrong side on the scoreboard, and that gap is the whole reason these recaps carry the disclaimer they do. Across the month the model has graded near its usual mark, with winning days and losing days roughly balancing out, and a Friday where the cheaper favorites held but the priciest one missed lands somewhere in the middle of that range rather than at either edge. The sober verdict is an even day pulled down by one loud miss, no more and no less, and a single routed favorite defines the model no more than a single dominant one does.

Responsible play

**This is a record of past model output, not betting advice.** Verdexed grades its model in public for transparency and entertainment. Past results do not predict future outcomes, nothing here is a recommendation to place a wager, and no pick is ever a guarantee, even a strong model loses regularly.

**You must be 21+** (or the legal age in your jurisdiction) and located where sports wagering is legal to bet. Sports betting is not available everywhere; know and follow the laws where you are. Never bet more than you can afford to lose, and never chase losses.

If gambling is affecting you or someone you know, help is available. In the US, call or text **1-800-GAMBLER** (1-800-426-2537), or visit ncpgambling.org. Please play responsibly.

Want more analysis?

Check out our predictions and DFS tools powered by the same quantitative engine.