Everything is FREE until August 1free through July 31 →
Back to Blog
AnalysisMLB2026-08-05

Yesterday's picks: how the model did (August 4)

By Verdexed Analytics

Tuesday was the best card this desk has graded. Six stated directions were published on the August 4 board and four landed. The firmest price of the night held for the first time in three attempts, a 2-0 Yankees win, and the widest gap on the board cashed at Wrigley, on the side the column's own text argued against.

The scorecard

Six stated directions, four correct.

The headline hit was Dodgers at Cubs, the widest projection-to-price gap on the slate. Los Angeles was quoted near -122, close to a 46 percent read on the Cubs once the margin comes out, while the projection went the other way at 55 percent Chicago. Chicago won 5-1. Tarik Skubal, in his first start since the trade from Detroit, allowed two runs on four hits over six innings and still lost. Dansby Swanson turned on the first pitch of the third for his 17th home run, and Nico Hoerner and Pete Crow-Armstrong each drove in a run. Los Angeles finished with four hits in its fifth straight defeat.

The second hit was the top of the confidence tier. Cardinals at Yankees carried the firmest number on the board, a 70 percent projection on New York against a vig-free market read in the mid-to-high 60s. The Yankees won 2-0. Jazz Chisholm Jr. homered in the second and George Lombard Jr. homered in the fifth for his first major league hit. St. Louis out-hit New York six to five and did not score. One correction belongs in the record: the morning card listed Cam Schlittler against Michael McGreevy, flagged as projected rather than confirmed. That pairing had actually been Monday's. Ryan Weathers started opposite Hunter Dobbins. The side cashed on a starter the card named incorrectly.

The third hit was Pirates at Brewers, where the projection had Milwaukee at 61 percent against a vig-free market read in the high 50s. Milwaukee won 4-2. Jackson Chourio and Andrew Vaughn homered, and Logan Henderson allowed two runs over six innings for his sixth straight winning decision. The card had flagged conflicting starter listings here, and the Henderson listing held.

The fourth hit was the smallest lean on the board, Marlins at Braves, published at 53 percent Atlanta with no retrievable price and called a coin flip with a faint home tilt. Atlanta won 4-2 behind six scoreless innings from Grant Holmes, with Ozzie Albies and Austin Riley homering.

The first miss was Twins at Royals. Minnesota was quoted at -148, roughly 57 percent after the margin, and the projection agreed at 57 percent. Kansas City won 8-2. Joe Ryan allowed five runs over 5 1/3 innings, and Randy Dobnak gave up one run on three hits in five innings against his former club.

The second miss was Mets at Guardians, where Cleveland was quoted near -120 at home and the read stayed qualitative because no projection was retrievable. New York won 6-2 behind four RBI from Luis Torrens.

No slate-wide accuracy or Brier figure for Tuesday was retrievable from Verdexed's public accuracy surface at the time of writing, so none is quoted, for a third straight morning.

Best call / worst miss

The best call was the Cubs, and for the third time in four days the honest version cuts against the column rather than for it. The published piece named the nine-point gap and then argued not to trust it, on the grounds that a two-time Cy Young winner's debut with a new club is an input a season-long model prices slowly. The model liked Chicago anyway, and Chicago won by four. The editorial hedge above the number was wrong again.

The worst miss was Kansas City, the cleanest kind of loss to report because nothing went sideways. The card's stated risk was unconfirmed starting pitching, and here both projected starters took the ball as listed. Price and projection agreed at 57 percent. Minnesota lost by six. Bobby Witt Jr. returned from a two-week absence with back tightness and went 3 for 5 with a two-run double, which no pre-game input captured. That is what a 57 percent side losing looks like, and it happens a little more than four times in ten.

What it means

A 4-2 day on six decisions is a good day and still a small one. Five graded cards now read 2-0, 1-1, 2-2, 3-2 and 4-2 on stated sides, or 12-7. Nineteen decisions carry essentially no information in either direction, and this run should be treated as noise until it is several times longer.

Two threads from earlier cards moved. The confidence tier, which had gone 1-3 from Saturday through Monday, went 2-1 on Tuesday. Four days is still far too short to call that either a problem or a recovery. The second thread is Los Angeles. A Dodgers side had been published and lost on three consecutive cards. On Tuesday the model was on the other team for the first time, and that is the day it was right, while the club dropped its fifth straight.

The missing accuracy figure remains the real limitation. A record assembled from named games is a weaker instrument than the model's own scored output, and three straight cards built that way should be weighted accordingly.

Responsible play

**This is a record of past model output, not betting advice.** Verdexed grades its model in public for transparency and entertainment. Past results do not predict future outcomes, nothing here is a recommendation to place a wager, and no pick is ever a guarantee, even a strong model loses regularly.

**You must be 21+** (or the legal age in your jurisdiction) and located where sports wagering is legal to bet. Sports betting is not available everywhere; know and follow the laws where you are. Never bet more than you can afford to lose, and never chase losses.

If gambling is affecting you or someone you know, help is available. In the US, call or text **1-800-GAMBLER** (1-800-426-2537), or visit ncpgambling.org. Please play responsibly.

Want more analysis?

Check out our predictions and DFS tools powered by the same quantitative engine.